Male conversations

Male (single sex) conversations

Can you guess who is speaking in this transcript? Analyse the dialogue below.

B:

Uh you know that really gay guy in our Age of Revolution class who sits in front of us? He wore shorts again, by the way, it’s like 42 degrees out he wore shorts again[laughter] it’s like a speedo, he wears a speedo to class he’s got incredibly skinny legs, you know

E:

You know like those shorts women volleyball players wear?  It’s like those it’s like French cut spandex

B:

You know what’s even more ridiculous? When you wear those shorts and like a parka on

C:

He’s either got some condition that he’s got to like have his legs exposed all the time or else he’s got really good legs

E:

He’s probably he’s he’s like he’s like at home combing his leg hairs

C:

He really likes his legs

B:

He doesn’t have any leg hair though

E:

He really likes his legs

A:

Very long very white and very skinny

B:

Yes and oh those ridiculous Reeboks that are always (indecipherable) and goofy white socks always striped tube socks

E:

He’s the antithesis of man

The point of reading this  transcript is that to any normal person they features and the nature of the transcript means that is appears to be a group of females However, actually this was a group of males. This research came from Deborah Cameron, who basically believed you can never know – males and females are very similar.

So what features did we find in this transcript?

 

  • Intensifiers ‘incredibly’
  • Fixed expressions ‘you know’
  • Filer ‘like’
  • Specialised vocabulary ‘French cut spandex’
  • Support 
  • Empty adjective ‘ridiculous’
  • Knowledge of female topic – apparel ‘Reeboks’
  • Initiation
  • Cooperative
  • Bitchiness 
  • Hedging ‘its like’
  • repetition ‘really likes his legs

 

 

Advertisements

Types of Conversations

Transactional conversations and Interactional conversations

Transactional

Interactions

Not personal

Personal

Purpose is to get goods or service. The conversation has a specific purpose

About talking = chatting

Phatic talk exists sometimes

Can begin with phatic talk

However, usually there is no clear-cut conversations. The conversation tend to be a mixture between the two i.e. a hybrid. 

Language & Gender: Female Conversations

Female (single sex) conversations

Aspects of female talk – Lakeoff 

Robin Lakeoff, 1975, identified 10 features of women’s language in a much challenged American study. I have copied them below; 

  1. They utilise hedges more e.g. ‘kind of’ ‘sort of’
  2. They use more polite forms e.g. ‘would you please’
  3. Use more tag questions ‘nice isn’t?’
  4. Use more peaking/intonational emphasis 
  5. They utilise more empty adjectives e.g. ‘sweet’ ‘cute’ ‘charming’
  6. They are hypercorrect with their grammar and pronunciation
  7. They lack a sense of humour
  8. Use more verbatim/direct quotations
  9. They have a more specialised vocabulary e.g. types of colours
  10. They use more high rise terminal (declarative statement used as question through intonation.)

Having evidence to back these points of Lakeoff is correct. However, this data was collated 35 years ago, with society changing every singly day, this data is aged. In the 21st century, I question whether women really lack a sense of humour. This is because to be understand and create humour one needs intelligence and the importance and quality of teaching to women within 35 years has increased. From this we can deduce that women’s sense of humour has probably increased. Nevertheless, these 10 points will help in backing up points in the exam.

Female Authority – in the workplace

Evidence from The Myth of Mars and Venus by Deborah Cameron: Female Authority – after research by Janet Holmes. Read example one.

Example One

Harriet:

Looks like there’s actually been a request for screendumps I know it was outside of the scope but people will be pretty worried about it

Clara:

no screendumps

Peg:

( sarcastically ) thank you Clara

Clara:

no screendumps

Matt:

we know we know you didn’t want them and we um er we’ve –

Clara:

that does not meet the criteria

Smithy:

so that’s a clear well maybe no

Clara:

it’s a no

Smithy:

it’s a no a royal no

How would you describe Clara’s management style here?  How does her language differ from stereotypical women’s language?

 

Her management style her is clear, forceful and assertive. Responses are not elaborated and she is not asking the questions. Her language differs from a stereotypical women’s language because is not talking too much or asking question or hedging and using politeness strategies. As I’ve said before stereotypes are wrong because the role of women have changed so their language has too this means that women migth start to sound like ‘the male stereotype’.

Read the transcript below:

Smithy:

how’s your Mum?

Clara:

sorry?

Smithy:

she broke her hip, didn’t she?

Clara:

my mother?  What are you talking about?

Ishmeen:

( laughing ) the queen mother

Clara:

oh ( putting on posh accent ) my husband and I are confident she’ll pull through.

What strategy has been put in place to deal with Clara’s management style?

To deal with Clara’s management style a humorous outlook is taken by the employees. They use a shared context to connect with her a put a lighter tone almost as if they were trying to escape from their professional roles. This part of the conversation changes from being transactional to interactional.

 

How does Clara herself cope with it?

 Clare allows the conversation to become interactive and copes with this strategy by being humorous too. She laughs it off and does not take this seriously.

The Politeness Principle

The politeness principle is the concept on how and why we are polite to one another. The first important word to understand is ‘face’. This is the speakers sense of linguistic and social identity. We all have two of these ‘faces’: we have a ‘positive face’ and a ‘negative face’. The positive face is our right to be approved and appreciated, whereas, our negative face is our right not to be imposed upon. We have 4 ways in which we approach this ‘face’.

‘Bald on-record strategy’ – 

this is where we threaten the ‘face’; we do absolutely nothing to be polite and minimize threats to the listeners’ face.

Positive politeness-

we appeal to the positive face and we appreciate and accept the listener as well as using politeness markers to ask of something to the listener.

Negative politeness – 

here we recognize the listeners’ negative face and use apologies and politeness markers to say something to the listener.

Off-record indirect strategy- 

is were we either use hints to communicate something or you rather just leave it and wait for someone else to say it.